You respond without allowing anyone to finish. Do I care what you think, No. Why should I. Do I like you, yes, your fun. Whether or not you agree with me, no worries, I could careless, with the exception if you offered HELP to me or others. Do that, and I will care.
Caracal, if you were doing similar field observations and had other interpitations, I would be very interested.
The important part of all this is, CONTEXT. Sir, you drift in and out of context and all based on your theories(non proven and not tested) In context, I would take one real field observation over any ten of your theories. No offense please, I would take that over anyones theories. I do consider your theories.
Sir. you would make a horrible field researcher. why, you think to much. All we do is record data. Not tell data what it is. As mentioned in this context, all the field data, in situ nests do is, offer probable cause to test. no more, no less. All your theorizing is for your head. and that's great, for you.
in context, most of what you theorize is not in context to the animals. its more about you. which again is fine. The context of field work is ONLY ABOUT THE ANIMALS. If they use large areas that do not fit in your box, its all about you. If sand is too heavy and sphagnum is liter, its about you. So what ever I see in nature, surely is out of context to you. in reality, you should not understand it, your not there.

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]