Posted by:
ScottThomson
at Sat Nov 20 04:03:59 2004 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by ScottThomson ]
Sorry Richard,
I am not up on the snakes as well as can be said for the turtles.
I did however see a reference that stated that Cannia was described by Gray 1842, with a full citation so I assumed that was correct. However, if you described it and it is valid and no-one has sunk it, then it is valid and should be used.
As for A rugosus, if you resurrected it and no one has since refuted that, again it is valid.
ahh nomenclature.... makes you go grey early doesn't it...
Cheers, Scott ----- Scott Thomson
http://www.carettochelys.com http://ittn.net
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
|