mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: richardwells at Wed Nov 24 17:47:47 2004 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by richardwells ] Thank you CKing for your most enlightening response. As usual your point of view is laced with the kind of juicy references that I look forward to reading. Without dismissing its objective truths, I still see molecular systematics as running the risk of becoming one almightly card-house skyscraper unless the kind of rigor that you have repeatedly proposed is implimented. It seems to me that sooner or later the whole construct will just tumble down in a confusing miasma of misinterpretation. Its collapse is probably already underway by the way mtDNA data has been used, but a few good kicks at the bottoms cards might not go astray. I would love to lay the boot in, but generally I tend not to pick fights with gangs of thugs or with those bigger than me. If they pick on me...well, that's another matter... [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ] | ||
>> Next Message: RE: The Molecular Clock is fact, not theory - CKing, Wed Nov 24 19:42:04 2004 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: The Molecular Clock is fact, not theory - CKing, Wed Nov 24 11:31:33 2004 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|