mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: CKing at Wed Nov 24 19:42:04 2004 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by CKing ] I am sorry to hear that you still think that molecular systematics is unreliable. I do not share your view that it is a house of cards and I see no reason why it should tumble down like one any time soon. I am not denying that morphology has a role in systematics. In fact, taxonomy is impossible without knowledge of evolutionary divergence, and such data can at present only be obtained through a study of morphological characters. Further, morphological characters can often serve as corrobative evidence for molecular systematics. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: Biogeography, Snakes and Island-Hopping - richardwells, Sun Nov 21 16:46:22 2004 << Previous topic: RichardWells - a question - HaroldD, Sat Oct 30 10:08:42 2004 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|