mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: dhl at Wed Mar 31 19:00:43 2004 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by dhl ] You've got to be kidding. You're taking 26 year-old immunological data over a very well supported topology based on 2.4 kb of DNA? Not wise. Taxomic designations should be nontrivial, and you're taxonomic ideas clearly are. Only when taxonomic ranks are based on biological reality (evolutionary history, which is nontrivial) do they have maximum meaning and heuristic power. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ] | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms - CKing, Fri Apr 2 02:55:42 2004 >> Next Message: RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms - paalexan, Fri Apr 9 16:21:30 2004 | ||
<< Previous Message: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms - CKing, Wed Mar 31 12:42:48 2004 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|