to vote for Libertarian candidates. Although they are not likely to win for President, they have been winning a lot of local, state, and occasionally, bigger races. And they are more likely to win than an unknown candidate who we like mainly because he or she supports our cause.

Libertarians generally will vote against any excess legislation with limited benefits. They are looking for smaller government, and less costs in both dollars and freedoms lost. So anytime you have the choice to vote for a Libertarian, check them out and see if you agree with them on their issues. But remember - they are going to be for less regulation for most ALL issues - not just the ones you happen to want less regulation for. So plan to support others' rights for less government interference, and maybe they will support us when we need it. You can't have it both ways! Too many people only want their own freedoms, and are happy to vote away freedoms that other people want.

[ Hide Replies ]

• FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - jeffb, Tue Mar 31 18:34:09 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - b_rickard, Tue Mar 31 20:19:53 2009
• NOT A JOKE - VERY REAL! - jeffb, Tue Mar 31 20:34:47 2009
• PIJAC PET ALERT on H.R.669 - Text Ver. - jeffb, Tue Mar 31 20:22:14 2009
• RE: PIJAC PET ALERT on H.R.669 - Text Ver. - jscrick, Tue Mar 31 23:45:16 2009
• RE: PIJAC PET ALERT on H.R.669 - Text Ver. - USARK, Wed Apr 1 08:22:50 2009
• I believe I said as much? - jscrick, Wed Apr 1 14:41:48 2009
• My take on the fix to this. - b_rickard, Wed Apr 1 14:52:18 2009
• Committee on Natural Resources - b_rickard, Wed Apr 1 15:01:08 2009
• RE: Committee on Natural Resources - CSRAJim, Fri Apr 3 23:12:13 2009
• Direct link to the committee - b_rickard, Wed Apr 1 15:07:12 2009
• Committee calender - b_rickard, Wed Apr 1 15:10:24 2009
• Best fix is really... - kathylove, Fri Apr 17 00:13:27 2009
• RE: PIJAC PET ALERT on H.R.669 - Text Ver. - runswithturtles, Sat Apr 4 19:02:57 2009
• April 23rd Date Tentative...... - USARK, Wed Apr 1 10:23:21 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - sschind, Thu Apr 2 10:21:30 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - sschind, Thu Apr 2 10:30:21 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - jeffb, Thu Apr 2 11:28:39 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - sschind, Thu Apr 2 14:17:09 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - jeffb, Thu Apr 2 15:42:21 2009
• It's simple - brhaco, Thu Apr 2 18:35:01 2009
• RE: It's simple - natsamjosh, Thu Apr 2 22:21:15 2009
• RE: It's simple - sschind, Fri Apr 3 08:38:23 2009
• I can only refer you - brhaco, Fri Apr 3 12:58:53 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - wstreps, Thu Apr 2 17:05:56 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - runswithturtles, Sat Apr 4 14:44:47 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - runswithturtles, Sat Apr 4 14:53:15 2009
• RE: FED HEARING APRIL 23 ON NONNATIVE BAN - oneye, Thu Apr 2 11:05:54 2009
• Do it! - boaphile, Sat Apr 4 20:05:05 2009
• RE: Do it! - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Sat Apr 4 20:22:45 2009
• IMO, we also need to... - natsamjosh, Sat Apr 4 22:17:00 2009
• RE: IMO, we also need to... - runswithturtles, Sat Apr 4 23:07:46 2009